2:06 PM 9/7/2020 - The News And Times: National security surveillance court finds FBI regularly does not follow rules - #FoxNews
- Get link
- X
- Other Apps
The News And Times1. VIDEO NEWS
________________________________
1. VIDEO NEWS from Michael_Novakhov (72 sites)  |
|---|
| euronewsru's YouTube Videos: Берлин ждёт ответов от Москвы |
From: euronewsru
Duration: 01:38
Состояние российского оппозиционера Алексея Навального улучшилось. Между тем в кабмине ФРГ сообщают, что Берлин может поменять свою позицию по строительству газопровода "Северный поток - 2" в зависимости от дальнейших действий России.
ЧИТАТЬ ДАЛЕЕ : https://ru.euronews.com/2020/09/07/berlin-waiting-answers-from-moscow-about-navalny Подписывайтесь: https://www.youtube.com/c/евроньюс?sub_confirmation=1 Прямой эфир euronews: https://www.youtube.com/c/евроньюс/live Euronews можно смотреть на YouTube на 12 языках: https://www.youtube.com/user/euronewsnetwork/channels #World  |
News Reviews
________________________________
________________________________
| News Reviews from Michael_Novakhov (13 sites) | ||
|---|---|---|
| Trump Investigations from Michael_Novakhov (124 sites): mikenov on Twitter: National security surveillance court finds FBI regularly does not follow rules fxn.ws/35e6jcz #FoxNews | ||
National security surveillance court finds FBI regularly does not follow rules fxn.ws/35e6jcz #FoxNews
| ||
| Trump Investigations from Michael_Novakhov (124 sites): mikenov on Twitter: RT @thehill: Priest tapped to be bishop by Pope Francis resigns after sexual abuse probe hill.cm/HE1f5dK pic.twitter.com/RreHsw7Ica | ||
Priest tapped to be bishop by Pope Francis resigns after sexual abuse probe hill.cm/HE1f5dK pic.twitter.com/RreHsw7Ica
Retweeted by
 Michael Novakhov (mikenov) on Monday, September 7th, 2020 5:36pm184 likes, 134 retweets | ||
| Trump Investigations from Michael_Novakhov (124 sites): mikenov on Twitter: Court overseeing national security surveillance finds FBI routinely doesn't observe rules all-nt.com/wp/2020/09/06/ | ||
Court overseeing national security surveillance finds FBI routinely doesn't observe rules all-nt.com/wp/2020/09/06/
| ||
| Global Security News from Michael_Novakhov (30 sites): 1. World from Michael_Novakhov (27 sites): FOX News: National security surveillance court finds FBI regularly does not follow rules | ||
The top United States federal court that oversees national security surveillance has found that the FBI regularly does not follow rules meant to protect the privacy of the American people.   | ||
| Global Security News from Michael_Novakhov (30 sites): Global Security News globalsecuritynews.org: 1. World from Michael_Novakhov (27 sites): FOX News: National security surveillance court finds FBI regularly does not follow rules | ||
The top United States federal court that oversees national security surveillance has found that the FBI regularly does not follow rules meant to protect the privacy of the American people.
The post 1. World from Michael_Novakhov (27 sites): FOX News: National security surveillance court finds FBI regularly does not follow rules first appeared on Global Security News - globalsecuritynews.org. | ||
| Trump Investigations from Michael_Novakhov (124 sites): mikenov on Twitter: News - Court overseeing national security surveillance finds FBI routinely doesn't observe rules - Google Search google.com/search?q=Court pic.twitter.com/JdzoSWkTiN | ||
News - Court overseeing national security surveillance finds FBI routinely doesn't observe rules - Google Search google.com/search?q=Court pic.twitter.com/JdzoSWkTiN
 | ||
| Global Security News from Michael_Novakhov (30 sites): 1. World from Michael_Novakhov (27 sites): FOX News: Orca who carried dead calf for 17 days in 'tour of grief' gives birth again | ||
The grieving killer whale who made global headlines two years ago for carrying her dead calf for more than two weeks is now a new mother, researchers announced Sunday.   | ||
| Global Security News from Michael_Novakhov (30 sites): Global Security News globalsecuritynews.org: 1. World from Michael_Novakhov (27 sites): FOX News: Orca who carried dead calf for 17 days in tour of grief gives birth again | ||
The grieving killer whale who made global headlines two years ago for carrying her dead calf for more than two weeks is now a new mother, researchers announced Sunday.
The post 1. World from Michael_Novakhov (27 sites): FOX News: Orca who carried dead calf for 17 days in 'tour of grief' gives birth again first appeared on Global Security News - globalsecuritynews.org. | ||
| Global Security News from Michael_Novakhov (30 sites): 1. World from Michael_Novakhov (27 sites): FOX News: Dr. Marc Siegel: Young adults living at home need to get coronavirus vaccine when available | ||
As a majority of young adults in the U.S. now live with their parents, Fox News medical contributor Dr. Marc Siegel says they need to get the coronavirus vaccine when it is available.   | ||
| Global Security News from Michael_Novakhov (30 sites): Global Security News globalsecuritynews.org: 1. World from Michael_Novakhov (27 sites): FOX News: Dr. Marc Siegel: Young adults living at home need to get coronavirus vaccine when available | ||
As a majority of young adults in the U.S. now live with their parents, Fox News medical contributor Dr. Marc Siegel says they need to get the coronavirus vaccine when it is available.
The post 1. World from Michael_Novakhov (27 sites): FOX News: Dr. Marc Siegel: Young adults living at home need to get coronavirus vaccine when available first appeared on Global Security News - globalsecuritynews.org. | ||
| Global Security News from Michael_Novakhov (30 sites): News and Times from Michael_Novakhov (15 sites): Michael Novakhov - SharedNewsLinks: 1:03 PM 9/7/2020 - Court overseeing national security surveillance finds FBI routinely doesn't observe rules - GS | ||
 1:03 PM 9/7/2020 - Court overseeing national security surveillance finds FBI routinely doesn't observe rules - GS
_________________________________________________________
| ||
| Global Security News from Michael_Novakhov (30 sites): Global Security News globalsecuritynews.org: News and Times from Michael_Novakhov (15 sites): Michael Novakhov SharedNewsLinks: 1:03 PM 9/7/2020 Court overseeing national security surveillance finds FBI routinely doesnt observe rules GS | ||
1:03 PM 9/7/2020 – Court overseeing national security surveillance finds FBI routinely doesn’t observe rules – GS
_________________________________________________________
| ||
| Top stories - Google News: For Long-Haulers, Covid-19 Takes a Toll on Mind as Well as Body - The New York Times | ||
For Long-Haulers, Covid-19 Takes a Toll on Mind as Well as Body The New York Times | ||
| Global Security News from Michael_Novakhov (30 sites): Top stories - Google News: For Long-Haulers, Covid-19 Takes a Toll on Mind as Well as Body - The New York Times | ||
For Long-Haulers, Covid-19 Takes a Toll on Mind as Well as Body The New York Times | ||
| Global Security News from Michael_Novakhov (30 sites): News and Times from Michael_Novakhov (15 sites): Top stories - Google News: For Long-Haulers, Covid-19 Takes a Toll on Mind as Well as Body - The New York Times | ||
For Long-Haulers, Covid-19 Takes a Toll on Mind as Well as Body The New York Times | ||
| Global Security News from Michael_Novakhov (30 sites): 1. World from Michael_Novakhov (27 sites): Top stories - Google News: For Long-Haulers, Covid-19 Takes a Toll on Mind as Well as Body - The New York Times | ||
For Long-Haulers, Covid-19 Takes a Toll on Mind as Well as Body The New York Times | ||
| Global Security News from Michael_Novakhov (30 sites): Global Security News globalsecuritynews.org: Top stories Google News: For Long-Haulers, Covid-19 Takes a Toll on Mind as Well as Body The New York Times | ||
For Long-Haulers, Covid-19 Takes a Toll on Mind as Well as Body The New York Times
The post Top stories - Google News: For Long-Haulers, Covid-19 Takes a Toll on Mind as Well as Body - The New York Times first appeared on Global Security News - globalsecuritynews.org. | ||
| Global Security News from Michael_Novakhov (30 sites): The FBI News Review: 1:03 PM 9/7/2020 - Court overseeing national security surveillance finds FBI routinely doesn't observe rules - GS | ||
1:03 PM 9/7/2020 - Court overseeing national security surveillance finds FBI routinely doesn't observe rules - GShttps://fbinewsreview.blogspot.com/2020/09/103-pm-972020-court-overseeing-national.html_________________________________________________________Michael Novakhov - SharedNewsLinksMichael Novakhov - SharedNewsLinks In 25 PostsMichael Novakhov - SharedNewsLinks | Michael Novakhov - | ||
| Global Security News from Michael_Novakhov (30 sites): 1. US Security from Michael_Novakhov (87 sites): The National Interest: Hitler's Bismarck Battleship vs. America's Iowa-Class: Who Would Have Survived? | ||
Kyle Mizokami Security, Americas  This is how a battleship battle between Germany and America would have gone down.Here's What You Need To Remember: The larger context of the battlethe U.S. Navy being forced to take on the German Navywould have had serious repercussions for the Pacific theater. Germany was, after all, considered the primary threat, with Japan second and Italy third. A more powerful German Navy (or weaker Royal Navy) would have had second order consequences for the Pacific, delaying the Solomons campaign, including the invasion of Guadalcanal, the Battle of the Coral Sea, and even the Battle of Midway.Despite the vast scope of the Second World War, the navies of the United States and Nazi Germany fought few, if any, direct surface engagements. By the time of Americas entry into the war the Royal Navy had already sunk or neutralized the lions share of Hitlers Kriegsmarine, with only Hitlers U-boats remaining a substantial German threat. But what if the UKs Royal Navy hadnt been as successful as it was, and the U.S. was forced to hunt down the German Navys major surface combatants? What if the Iowa-class fast battleships had been sortied into the Atlantic to square off against their counterparts, the Bismarck-class battleships? The Bismarck-class battleships were the largest surface ships built by Germany before and during the Second World War. Germany had been prohibited by the Treaty of Versailles to build warships over 10,000 tons, but the Anglo-German Naval Treaty of 1935 implicitly allowed themthough the German Navy was not to exceed thirty five percent the size of the Royal Navy. With that restriction out of the way, Germany immediately began construction on the Bismarck-class battleships. Two ships, the Bismarck and Tirpitz, were planned. The ships were 821 feet long and displaced up to 50,000 tons fully loaded. Twelve high-pressure boilers powered three turbines, giving the ship a top speed of 30.1 knots. Three FuMo-23 search radars could detect surface targets at more than thirteen miles. The Bismarck class had eight fifteen-inch guns, each capable of hurling an armor piercing, capped round up to 21.75 miles. The 1,764-pound killer shell traveled at 2,960 feet per second out the bore, faster than the bullet of a high-powered rifle. At 11 miles, it could penetrate 16.5 inches of armor, or roughly to the horizon at sea level, although it could theoretically hit targets much further. Both battleships were heavily protected, with 12.5 inches of steel at the main belt, 8.7 inch armored bulkheads, and 14.1 inches of armor on the main gun turrets. The eight guns were installed in four turrets of two guns each. This spread the battleships main armament out among more protected turrets, increasing their survivability in a gunfight. Overall, the Bismarck class was an impressive combination of firepower, speed, and protection. The Iowa-class battleships were the most powerful battleships built for the U.S. Navy. Four ships: Iowa, New Jersey, Missouri, and Wisconsin were built. Each was approximately 861 feet long and weighed 52,000 tons. Eight water boilers connected to General Electric steam turbines propelled the battleships along at a speedy 32.5-knot maximum speed. Iowa had nine sixteen-inch guns. Each Mark 7 gun could launch a 2,700 pound armor piercing shell 11.36 miles to penetrate 20 inches of steel plateand even farther to a lesser penetration. In addition to search radar, the Iowas had Mk 13 fire control radars, allowing them to engage targets at extreme ranges and at night. The Mk 13 had a theoretical range out to 45 miles, and could even spot where the Iowas errant rounds landed, making aiming corrections much easier. The Iowas too were heavily armored, with 12.1 inches at the main belt, 11.3-inch bulkheads, and an amazing 19.7 inches of armor on the main turrets. The ships vital combat information center and ammunition magazines were buried deep in their armored hulls. Now, on to the battle. Its 1942, and the new American battleship Iowa has been rushed into service to hunt the Bismarck. Bismarck, her sister ship Tirpitz, and other large German combatants have made the Atlantic too dangerous to send convoys across, something the United Kingdom desperately needs. A fast battleship designed to operate alongside aircraft carriers, Iowa can cover a lot of ocean. Operating alone, she detects Bismarckalso operating alone. The duel is on. Despite the Bismarcks well-trained crew, good design and powerful weapons, Iowa has one technological innovation the German battlewagon doesnt: radar-directed main guns. Iowa can fire much more accurately at longer distance targets. This allows Iowa to out-stick the Bismarck, which must close to within visual range for its fire control systems and procedures to work effectively. While Bismarck would avoid a nighttime duel, Iowa would welcome itand its 2.5-knot advantage in speed means it can force a night battle if it wants to, chasing Bismarck down before sunrise. Iowas combination of the Mk 13 fire control radar and Mk 7 shells means it can fire first, hit first, and hurt first. While Bismarcks armor protection and distributed firepower could help ensure it lasts long enough above the waves to damage Iowa, its unlikely could save itself, damaging the American battleship enough to make it break off the attack. Iowa wins. The larger context of the battlethe U.S. Navy being forced to take on the German Navywould have had serious repercussions for the Pacific theater. Germany was, after all, considered the primary threat, with Japan second and Italy third. A more powerful German Navy (or weaker Royal Navy) would have had second order consequences for the Pacific, delaying the Solomons campaign, including the invasion of Guadalcanal, the Battle of the Coral Sea, and even the Battle of Midway. U.S. Navy planners in the Pacific, still overestimating the value of battleships, could have been less daring in their absence and fought a holding action until late 1942 or 1943. Had things been different we might think of Americas initial war against the Axis as taking place in the Atlantic and not the Pacific, the Marines hitting the beach in Iceland and not Guadalcanal, and the cataclysmic battle between the battleships Bismarck and Iowa. Kyle Mizokami is a defense and national security writer based in San Francisco who has appeared in the Diplomat, Foreign Policy, War is Boring and the Daily Beast. In 2009 he cofounded the defense and security blog Japan Security Watch. You can follow him on Twitter: @KyleMizokami. This article first appeared several years ago. Image: Wikipedia. | ||
| Global Security News from Michael_Novakhov (30 sites): 1. US Security from Michael_Novakhov (87 sites): "International Security" - Google News: WISeKey Semiconductors gets renewal compliance with the international ISO 27001 certification for information security - GlobeNewswire | ||
WISeKey Semiconductors gets renewal compliance with the international ISO 27001 certification for information security GlobeNewswire | ||
| Global Security News from Michael_Novakhov (30 sites): Global Security News globalsecuritynews.org: 1. US Security from Michael_Novakhov (87 sites): The National Interest: Hitlers Bismarck Battleship vs. Americas Iowa-Class: Who Would Have Survived? | ||
Kyle Mizokami
The post 1. US Security from Michael_Novakhov (87 sites): The National Interest: Hitler's Bismarck Battleship vs. America's Iowa-Class: Who Would Have Survived? first appeared on Global Security News - globalsecuritynews.org.Security, Americas This is how a battleship battle between Germany and America would have gone down.Here’s What You Need To Remember: The larger context of the battlethe U.S. Navy being forced to take on the German Navywould have had serious repercussions for the Pacific theater. Germany was, after all, considered the primary threat, with Japan second and Italy third. A more powerful German Navy (or weaker Royal Navy) would have had second order consequences for the Pacific, delaying the Solomons campaign, including the invasion of Guadalcanal, the Battle of the Coral Sea, and even the Battle of Midway.Despite the vast scope of the Second World War, the navies of the United States and Nazi Germany fought few, if any, direct surface engagements. By the time of Americas entry into the war the Royal Navy had already sunk or neutralized the lions share of Hitlers Kriegsmarine, with only Hitlers U-boats remaining a substantial German threat. But what if the UKs Royal Navy hadnt been as successful as it was, and the U.S. was forced to hunt down the German Navys major surface combatants? What if the Iowa-class fast battleships had been sortied into the Atlantic to square off against their counterparts, the Bismarck-class battleships? The Bismarck-class battleships were the largest surface ships built by Germany before and during the Second World War. Germany had been prohibited by the Treaty of Versailles to build warships over 10,000 tons, but the Anglo-German Naval Treaty of 1935 implicitly allowed themthough the German Navy was not to exceed thirty five percent the size of the Royal Navy. With that restriction out of the way, Germany immediately began construction on the Bismarck-class battleships. Two ships, the Bismarck and Tirpitz, were planned. The ships were 821 feet long and displaced up to 50,000 tons fully loaded. Twelve high-pressure boilers powered three turbines, giving the ship a top speed of 30.1 knots. Three FuMo-23 search radars could detect surface targets at more than thirteen miles. The Bismarck class had eight fifteen-inch guns, each capable of hurling an armor piercing, capped round up to 21.75 miles. The 1,764-pound killer shell traveled at 2,960 feet per second out the bore, faster than the bullet of a high-powered rifle. At 11 miles, it could penetrate 16.5 inches of armor, or roughly to the horizon at sea level, although it could theoretically hit targets much further. Both battleships were heavily protected, with 12.5 inches of steel at the main belt, 8.7 inch armored bulkheads, and 14.1 inches of armor on the main gun turrets. The eight guns were installed in four turrets of two guns each. This spread the battleships main armament out among more protected turrets, increasing their survivability in a gunfight. Overall, the Bismarck class was an impressive combination of firepower, speed, and protection. The Iowa-class battleships were the most powerful battleships built for the U.S. Navy. Four ships: Iowa, New Jersey, Missouri, and Wisconsin were built. Each was approximately 861 feet long and weighed 52,000 tons. Eight water boilers connected to General Electric steam turbines propelled the battleships along at a speedy 32.5-knot maximum speed. Iowa had nine sixteen-inch guns. Each Mark 7 gun could launch a 2,700 pound armor piercing shell 11.36 miles to penetrate 20 inches of steel plateand even farther to a lesser penetration. In addition to search radar, the Iowas had Mk 13 fire control radars, allowing them to engage targets at extreme ranges and at night. The Mk 13 had a theoretical range out to 45 miles, and could even spot where the Iowas errant rounds landed, making aiming corrections much easier. The Iowas too were heavily armored, with 12.1 inches at the main belt, 11.3-inch bulkheads, and an amazing 19.7 inches of armor on the main turrets. The ships vital combat information center and ammunition magazines were buried deep in their armored hulls. Now, on to the battle. Its 1942, and the new American battleship Iowa has been rushed into service to hunt the Bismarck. Bismarck, her sister ship Tirpitz, and other large German combatants have made the Atlantic too dangerous to send convoys across, something the United Kingdom desperately needs. A fast battleship designed to operate alongside aircraft carriers, Iowa can cover a lot of ocean. Operating alone, she detects Bismarckalso operating alone. The duel is on. Despite the Bismarcks well-trained crew, good design and powerful weapons, Iowa has one technological innovation the German battlewagon doesnt: radar-directed main guns. Iowa can fire much more accurately at longer distance targets. This allows Iowa to out-stick the Bismarck, which must close to within visual range for its fire control systems and procedures to work effectively. While Bismarck would avoid a nighttime duel, Iowa would welcome itand its 2.5-knot advantage in speed means it can force a night battle if it wants to, chasing Bismarck down before sunrise. Iowas combination of the Mk 13 fire control radar and Mk 7 shells means it can fire first, hit first, and hurt first. While Bismarcks armor protection and distributed firepower could help ensure it lasts long enough above the waves to damage Iowa, its unlikely could save itself, damaging the American battleship enough to make it break off the attack. Iowa wins. The larger context of the battlethe U.S. Navy being forced to take on the German Navywould have had serious repercussions for the Pacific theater. Germany was, after all, considered the primary threat, with Japan second and Italy third. A more powerful German Navy (or weaker Royal Navy) would have had second order consequences for the Pacific, delaying the Solomons campaign, including the invasion of Guadalcanal, the Battle of the Coral Sea, and even the Battle of Midway. U.S. Navy planners in the Pacific, still overestimating the value of battleships, could have been less daring in their absence and fought a holding action until late 1942 or 1943. Had things been different we might think of Americas initial war against the Axis as taking place in the Atlantic and not the Pacific, the Marines hitting the beach in Iceland and not Guadalcanal, and the cataclysmic battle between the battleships Bismarck and Iowa. Kyle Mizokami is a defense and national security writer based in San Francisco who has appeared in the Diplomat, Foreign Policy, War is Boring and the Daily Beast. In 2009 he cofounded the defense and security blog Japan Security Watch. You can follow him on Twitter: @KyleMizokami. This article first appeared several years ago. Image: Wikipedia. |
The FBI News Review.
The News And Times - Blogs By Michael Novakhov
____________________________________________________________
- Get link
- X
- Other Apps
Comments
Post a Comment