Iran fires barrages of ballistic missiles at Israel, killing 3 people and wounding dozens - timesofisrael.com ... The outcome of the Israel - Iran war of June 2025: Predictive Analysis
As of June 14, 2025, the Israel-Iran conflict has significantly escalated into a direct military confrontation, moving beyond the previous "shadow war" of proxy attacks and covert operations.
Here's a predictive analysis of potential outcomes and ongoing dynamics:
1. Escalation and "Controlled" Conflict:
- Continued Strikes: The current expectation is that Israel will continue its air campaign for at least several days or even weeks, aiming to degrade Iran's nuclear program and military capabilities.
4 Iran will almost certainly continue its retaliatory strikes.5 - No Full-Scale Ground War (Currently): While the intensity is high, a full-scale, conventional ground war between Israel and Iran directly is not the most likely immediate outcome.
6 Both sides appear to be operating within a framework of "controlled escalation," attempting to inflict damage and signal resolve without triggering an unmanageable regional war. However, miscalculation remains a significant risk. - Proxy Involvement: While some of Iran's "Axis of Resistance" proxies (excluding the Houthis, who have targeted Israel) have issued condemnations, they have not yet significantly intervened directly on Iran's behalf. Their capabilities are reported to be weakened from prior conflicts. However, there's a risk that these groups, particularly Hezbollah, could be drawn in if the conflict broadens or intensifies further.
2. Iran's Nuclear Program:
- Setback, Not Elimination: Israeli strikes are intended to delay or cripple Iran's uranium enrichment and missile programs.
7 While these attacks will likely set back Iran's progress, they are unlikely to eliminate Iran's nuclear knowledge or its long-term ambition to achieve nuclear weapon capability.8 - Increased Secrecy and Motivation: The strikes could paradoxically incentivize Iran to pursue its nuclear program more covertly and with greater determination. Iran may feel it can no longer "sit on the fence" regarding a nuclear bomb and could accelerate efforts to achieve a weapon, seeing it as an essential deterrent.
9
3. International Response and US Role:
- Calls for Restraint: The international community, including the UN, EU, and various regional countries, has condemned the escalation and urged both sides to exercise maximum restraint.
10 The UN Security Council held an emergency meeting at Iran's request.11 - US Position: The US has stated it was not militarily involved in Israel's strikes and that Israel acted unilaterally.
12 However, the US had prior knowledge of the attacks and has provided defensive support to Israel in intercepting Iranian missiles.13 The US emphasizes protecting American forces in the region and has warned Iran against targeting US interests.14 There's a strong US desire to avoid direct military entanglement. - Diplomatic Efforts: Despite the military actions, there's still a quiet push for diplomacy, potentially via intermediaries like Oman or Pakistan, to de-escalate tensions and address nuclear concerns. However, Iran has reportedly withdrawn from US-Iran nuclear talks following the Israeli strikes.
15
4. Geopolitical and Economic Impact:
- Regional Destabilization: The conflict significantly destabilizes the Middle East, with potential spillover effects on energy markets (oil prices have already surged due to geopolitical risk premium), shipping, and regional security.
16 - Economic Blowback on Iran: The conflict is likely to exacerbate Iran's economic woes, with sanctions tightening and potential further currency plunges. This could lead to increased public discontent, although a nationalist backlash might temporarily rally support for the regime.
- Central Asian Concerns: Central Asian nations are concerned about the conflict's impact, including potential economic disruptions, increased migration, and security vulnerabilities.
17 They are generally advocating for de-escalation and seeking to maintain neutrality. - Russia and China: Russia and China are likely to use the situation to their strategic advantage. Russia may seek to strengthen its influence in Central Asia and potentially demand Iranian support in other areas (e.g., intelligence, cyber) in exchange for its own backing. China will likely maintain a neutral mediator image while increasing security cooperation with Gulf states.
5. Long-Term Outlook:
- "Lawnmowing Campaign": Some analysts suggest Israel may be embarking on a long-term "lawnmowing campaign" of repeated military operations to keep Iran's nuclear program retarded and its proxy networks in check, implying a state of protracted, low-to-medium intensity conflict.
18 - New Deterrence Norms: The direct confrontation signifies a collapse of previous deterrence norms. The region is entering a period where great power competition discourages mediation, making the conflict more prone to sustained friction.
In summary, the immediate outcome of the June 2025 Israel-Iran conflict is a period of intense, direct military engagement, primarily characterized by airstrikes and missile exchanges.
Articles and Tweets
Chief of Staff Eyal Zamir: “We have destroyed all air defenses between Israel and Tehran. From now on our planes will freely attack targets in Tehran with increasing intensity.”
Comments
Post a Comment